|
|
|
![]() |
Evaluating Training Programs: Kirkpatrick's 4 Levels |
|
The most widely used and popular model for the evaluation of training programs is known as "The Four Levels of Learning Evaluation." The model was defined in 1959 by Donald L. Kirkpatrick in a series of articles that appeared in the US Training and Development Journal. Kirkpatrick redefined the evaluation model with his 1998 book "Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels." The idea behind the model is for an organization to have meaningful evaluation of learning in the organization. The degree of difficulty increases as you move through the levels. However, the knowledge learned regarding the effectiveness of the training program more than compensates for this. The four levels of the model are:
Level 1: Reaction Kirkpatrick refers to Level 1 as a measure of customer satisfaction. Most of the forms that people fill out at the end of a class or workshop are instruments for measuring Level 1. Here are 8 guidelines that Kirkpatrick recommends to get maximum benefit from reaction sheets: 1. Determine what you want to find out Level 2: Learning Kirkpatrick defines learning as the extent to which participants change attitudes, increase knowledge, and/or increase skill as a result of attending a program. So to measure learning we need to determine the following:
Here are guidelines for evaluating learning: 1. Use a control group if it is practical Level 3: Behavior Level three can be defined as the extent to which a change in behavior has occurred because someone attended a training program. In order for change in behavior to occur, four conditions are necessary:
Here are some guidelines for evaluating behavior: 1. Use a control group if that is practical Level 4: Results This involves measuring the final results that occurred because a person attended a training session. This can include increased production, improved work quality, reduced turnover, etc. Level four can be difficult because you must determine what final results occurred because of attendance and participation in a training program. You must also evaluate the conditions that the trainee is operating in. It is important to determine whether the conditions set forth above in Level 3 have been met. If there are conditions in the office that prevent the trainee from using the knowledge that they have learned, than the training can not be faulted for not "doing the job." The problem lies in the conditions that the employee is working in. How many times have you heard, "Oh, forget what you learned in training, that's not how we do it in this office." This is a clear example a a conditional problem with the operating environment. Here are some guidelines for evaluating results: 1. Use a control group if it is practical
Summary This is a basic introduction to Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. More information is available through:
|
![]()
Copyright © 2010 Employment Security - All Rights Reserved